10 Best Proxy Browsers & Antidetect Browsers in 2026

A proxy browser combines separate browser profiles with profile-level network settings. In most products reviewed here, each profile can preserve its own cookies and local storage, expose its own browser configuration, and use a separately assigned proxy.

That does not make every product equivalent—or make any browser “undetectable.” Some are built for manual profile management, some for teams, and others for automated browser fleets. This guide compares the current options by documented capabilities, price, proxy support, and use-case fit.

Quick Answer

GoLogin is the most balanced starting point for a solo operator, combining a free plan, external proxies, limited built-in traffic, cloud launches, and API access. Choose Multilogin for an integrated browser-and-cloud-phone platform, AdsPower for visual automation, Octo Browser for structured profile operations, or Kameleo for developer-controlled automation priced by concurrent browsers.

No option is universally best. Choose according to profile count, simultaneous sessions, team permissions, automation framework, data-storage model, and whether you need built-in proxies or want to bring your own provider.

Key Takeaways

• “Proxy browser” is not a standardized product category. In this guide, it means a multi-profile browser that can assign a proxy to each profile; many vendors call the same category an antidetect browser.
• The browser and proxy control different layers. The browser manages cookies, storage, profile settings, and product-dependent fingerprint signals. The proxy supplies the network route and public exit IP.
• GoLogin is the strongest general-purpose starting point for a solo user in this documented comparison. Buyers who need member seats should compare its team tiers rather than treating the entry plan as a small-team package.
• A free plan may not include the feature you actually need. API access, team roles, cloud storage, bulk actions, concurrent launches, and proxy traffic often have separate limits.
• Proxy charges are usually separate from browser pricing. Several products sell or bundle limited traffic, but all reviewed options that matter for Proxidize users support external proxies.
• An antidetect browser does not guarantee anonymity, account acceptance, or immunity from restrictions. Use these tools only for accounts and systems you are authorized to operate, and follow applicable law, contracts, platform rules, and privacy requirements.

Methodology and disclosure: Prices and capabilities were checked against first-party product pages and documentation on September 28, 2026. We did not have equivalent paid accounts, machines, targets, profile counts, and proxy routes for a controlled performance or fingerprint-acceptance benchmark. Rankings therefore represent the strongest documented fit for each stated use case—not measured speed, reliability, target access, or “undetectability.” Proxidize publishes this comparison and provides external proxy infrastructure compatible with many of the browsers listed. It does not sell any of the browser subscriptions reviewed here. Prices exclude tax and can change with billing term, promotion, currency, add-ons, and selected capacity.

Best Proxy Browsers at a Glance

Pricing and Feature Gates

*OS support describes where the desktop client runs, not which operating system a browser profile can report. GoLogin also provides an Android app; Multilogin, MoreLogin, and other products may offer cloud-phone or emulated-mobile environments that are separate from desktop-client support. Prices use monthly billing. Annual commitments can reduce the monthly equivalent. Included profiles, users, launches, browser minutes, concurrency, automation, and proxy traffic differ substantially.

The table is not a universal performance leaderboard. Kameleo meters concurrent browsers rather than stored profiles; Nstbrowser combines subscriptions with usage-based overages; and Ghost Browser solves a simpler identity-and-workspace problem than the full fingerprint-management products.

Detailed Reviews of the Best Proxy Browsers

1. GoLogin: Best Overall Proxy Browser for Solo Operators

GoLogin is the most balanced starting point for an individual operator because it covers the common requirements without forcing a high initial commitment. It provides persistent Orbita browser profiles, a three-profile free plan, an automatic seven-day trial, desktop and web access, cloud launches, proxy management, profile sharing, and developer interfaces.

Its current pricing documentation lists Professional from $9 per month with 10 profiles and 2GB of GoLogin residential traffic. Professional is explicitly a solo-user tier: it includes profile shares and API access but no team-member seats. Business begins at $119 per month on monthly billing and includes one member seat, with additional seats sold separately. Its proxy documentation confirms HTTP/HTTPS and SOCKS5 support, third-party providers, manual or bulk import, and a dedicated Proxy Manager.

GoLogin also documents a REST API, SDK, headless/headful launches, Selenium and Puppeteer, and cloud-controlled profiles. This makes it suitable for individuals who want a visual interface today but may automate later.

Choose GoLogin when: one operator wants a low-cost, cross-platform entry point with free profiles, external proxies, cloud launch options, and an upgrade path to automation.

Main limitations: the entry tier is not a team plan, the included proxy allowance remains 2GB, and Orbita is Chromium-based. Teams should price member seats, profile sharing, cloud concurrency, and proxy traffic together.

2. Multilogin: Best Integrated Browser and Cloud-Phone Platform

Multilogin now combines browser profiles, Android cloud phones, built-in proxy traffic, mobile minutes, team features, and automation within one pricing system. That makes it a strong fit when a team genuinely needs both web profiles and native mobile-app environments rather than mobile-looking desktop browser profiles alone.

The current Multilogin pricing page lists a permanent free plan with five cloud profiles, a one-time 200MB proxy allowance, and 30 cloud-mobile minutes. Pro starts at $11 per month for 10 profiles with recurring included proxy traffic and mobile minutes. Higher plans add profiles, seats, bulk operations, and capacity.

Multilogin supports its own residential, mobile, and ISP products, but users can also configure custom HTTP, HTTPS, or SOCKS5 proxies. Its official materials document an API, CLI, Selenium, Puppeteer, and Playwright support. Browser and cloud-phone profiles have separate configuration details, so confirm that the chosen automation interface covers the exact environment required.

Choose Multilogin when: one workspace must manage both browser profiles and cloud Android environments, with built-in connectivity and external proxy support.

Main limitations: the unified platform introduces more billing dimensions—profiles, traffic, mobile minutes, seats, and add-ons. Buyers who only need desktop browser profiles may pay for breadth they do not use. Test the required browser/mobile workflow before committing.

3. AdsPower: Best for No-Code Automation and Synchronization

AdsPower is strongest when the operator wants visual automation in addition to browser profiles. It combines Chromium-based SunBrowser, Firefox-based FlowerBrowser, a Synchronizer that repeats actions across profiles, a visual RPA system, bulk management, a Local API, and team permissions.

The current AdsPower pricing page provides two permanent free profiles and an optional seven-day trial. Paid plans start at $9 per month for 10 profiles. The displayed price changes with profile count, members, term, currency, and promotions, so price the actual configuration rather than relying on the lowest headline.

AdsPower's official proxy documentation supports HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, and SSH, plus authentication, a change-IP URL for compatible mobile proxies, and an in-app connection check. AdsPower itself says it does not supply a general built-in proxy pool; its interface can connect to external providers or facilitate purchases through listed third parties.

Choose AdsPower when: non-developers need RPA or synchronized browser actions, while technical users still need a Local API and bulk profile/proxy controls.

Main limitations: the number of features can make initial configuration more involved. Verify which RPA, API, team, and mobile features are included in the selected plan.

4. Octo Browser: Best for Structured Profiles and Higher-Tier API Work

Octo Browser provides a polished profile model built around folders, tags, templates, Proxy Manager, temporary proxies, team permissions, Action Log, and an API on higher plans. It is a strong fit for teams that value a controlled profile inventory and can justify a paid-only entry.

Octo prices subscriptions in tokens per 30 days. Its subscription documentation currently lists Lite at 10 tokens for three profiles, Starter at 29 tokens for 10 profiles, and Base at 79 tokens for 100 profiles with API access. Team and Advanced increase profile, member, and API allowances. The profile count shown in an interactive calculator may include purchasable add-ons, so distinguish included resources from the maximum.

The browser accepts HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, and SSH proxies, with saved and temporary connections, bulk profile import, and proxy checks. Its API documentation covers Playwright, Puppeteer/Pyppeteer, Selenium, CDP, headless launches, and one-time profiles, although API access begins at Base.

Choose Octo Browser when: you want structured desktop profile management, detailed organization, and a documented automation path—and do not require a permanent free plan.

Main limitations: browser and proxy costs are separate, API access starts well above the entry subscription, and mobile-style browser profiles are not the same as native Android applications. See the full Octo Browser review, pricing, and proxy setup guide before buying.

5. Kameleo: Best for Developer-Controlled Automation at Scale

Kameleo is the clearest developer-oriented choice in this list. Unlike most competitors, its current pricing centers on concurrent running browsers, not the number of profiles stored. That model is useful for automation teams that can estimate parallel capacity more accurately than a profile inventory.

The Kameleo pricing page lists a free tier with two concurrent browsers, 300 minutes of browser usage, 100 cloud profiles, and three team members. Startup costs €59 with monthly billing for 10 concurrent browsers; the page currently shows a €45 monthly equivalent with an annual commitment. Paid plans include unlimited browser runtime, unlimited local profiles, 5,000 cloud profiles by default, and unlimited team members; Business and Enterprise raise concurrency and API-rate limits.

Kameleo provides Python, JavaScript, and C# SDKs, official Docker images, and documented Selenium, Puppeteer, and Playwright connections. Its proxy tutorial supports HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, and SSH per profile.

Choose Kameleo when: developers need SDK-driven browsers, containers, headless and headed operation, large profile storage, and pricing aligned with simultaneous sessions.

Main limitations: concurrency limits can be more expensive than profile-count pricing for workloads with many simultaneous interactive sessions. The free tier has a browser-minute allowance, and mobile profiles are emulated mobile browsers—not native mobile apps or physical devices.

6. Dolphin Anty: Best for Visual Scenarios and Synchronized Actions

Dolphin Anty combines persistent browser profiles with mass actions, an action Synchronizer, a visual Scenario Builder, team controls on higher plans, cloud synchronization, and API automation.

Its current plan documentation provides five profiles on the permanent free plan, with up to three running simultaneously. The Starter plan begins at $10 per month for 20 profiles. Base costs $89 for 100 profiles, Team $159 for 300, and Enterprise $299 for 1,000 or more. Longer commitments currently receive published discounts.

The official plan comparison lists HTTP, SOCKS4, SOCKS5, and SSH proxy support, change-IP links, Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, local and remote APIs, and the Scenario Builder on paid plans.

Choose Dolphin Anty when: visual scenarios, synchronized actions, bulk profile operations, and a low-priced 20-profile entry plan are more important than mobile-app infrastructure.

Main limitations: the free tier has creation, proxy, extension, and simultaneous-run limits. Team members cost extra on team-oriented plans, and the Scenario Builder does not eliminate the need for error handling, review, or rate control.

7. MoreLogin: Best Low-Cost Browser and Cloud-Phone Combination

MoreLogin provides desktop browser profiles, cloud phones, proxy management, team collaboration, a Synchronizer, RPA, and an expanding developer platform. It is appealing when buyers want a $9 desktop entry while retaining an option for pay-per-minute or monthly Android cloud phones.

The current subscription documentation lists two free profiles and two users. Paid desktop capacity begins at $9 per 30 days for 10 profiles, with longer-term discounts and configurable additional users. Cloud phones are billed separately.

MoreLogin supports HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 external proxies, saved proxy resources, rotation URLs for compatible mobile proxies, and several IP databases for checking location. Its developer documentation describes local and remote APIs, Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, remote CDP connections, CLI, RPA, and cloud-phone control.

Choose MoreLogin when: a low-cost desktop profile plan and optional cloud phones need to coexist with visual and code-based automation.

Main limitations: cloud-phone charges are separate from browser-profile pricing, and current APIs have version and environment requirements. Confirm whether the intended workflow needs the local desktop client, a cloud runtime, or a cloud phone before designing the integration.

8. Incogniton: Best Extended Free Evaluation

Incogniton gives new users 10 browser profiles for the first two months, after which the free allowance becomes three. This is the longest useful free evaluation window in the comparison for someone who needs more than a handful of persistent desktop profiles.

The Incogniton pricing page lists Starter Plus at $19.99 per month for 10 profiles, Entrepreneur at $29.99 for 50 profiles, and Professional at $79.99 for 150 profiles and three team seats. Six-month and annual terms reduce the monthly equivalent. API access, Synchronizer, cookie tools, profile transfer, and Selenium/Puppeteer integration begin on Entrepreneur rather than Starter Plus.

Incogniton documents HTTP, SOCKS5, and SSH custom proxies, a proxy shop, and current developer tooling. Its developer center now describes REST APIs, TypeScript and Python SDKs, CLI, and launches through Puppeteer, Playwright, or Selenium.

Choose Incogniton when: you want to evaluate 10 persistent profiles over two months before deciding whether automation or team tiers justify the cost.

Main limitations: the free allowance drops after two months, advanced productivity and automation features require at least Entrepreneur, and the low entry plan should not be compared with higher tiers as if it includes their API and synchronization features.

9. Nstbrowser: Best for Usage-Based Profile Launches

Nstbrowser combines persistent standard profiles, disposable once profiles, built-in and external proxies, RPA, APIs, containers, AI-agent tooling, and pay-as-you-go overages. Its pricing is unusual because a subscription grants stored-profile and daily-launch capacity while additional launches and proxy traffic can be billed separately.

The current Nstbrowser pricing page lists a free plan with 500 stored browser profiles and 30 standard-profile launches per day. Starter is $29.90 per month with 20,000 profiles, 3,000 standard launches per day, 20 team members, and limited included proxy traffic. Growth and Scale increase those limits.

Its proxy documentation supports custom HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 connections as well as built-in rotating residential, IPv6, datacenter, and static ISP products. Official SDK guides cover Selenium and Puppeteer, while its documentation also advertises Playwright compatibility, RPA, APIs, and profile-level proxy changes.

Choose Nstbrowser when: the workload benefits from large profile inventories, disposable sessions, programmatic launches, or a mixture of subscription capacity and usage-based overages.

Main limitations: the large stored-profile number is not the same as unlimited active browsers or launches. Buyers must model daily launches, overage rates, proxy traffic, team limits, and any separately billed CAPTCHA or unlocking services. Validate the complete bill against one representative workload.

10. Ghost Browser: Best Simple Multi-Identity Browser

Ghost Browser is deliberately the outlier. It creates color-coded identities and workspaces inside a Chromium-based browser so different tabs can use separate cookie jars. It is useful when the requirement is simpler than a full antidetect platform: several client sessions, QA roles, or regional browser views in one window.

The Ghost Browser pricing page lists a free version with up to three identities. The free tier includes Ghost Proxy Control for assignment by workspace or identity, though not by individual tab. Basic costs $25 on monthly billing but explicitly excludes Proxy Control. Pro costs $55 on monthly billing, or $550 paid annually ($45.83 per month before rounding), and supports a different proxy by tab, identity, or workspace.

Choose Ghost Browser when: you need convenient cookie separation and granular proxy assignment without extensive fingerprint configuration, cloud phones, or a large profile-automation platform.

Main limitations: Ghost Browser is not a like-for-like antidetect browser. Its pricing structure means the paid Basic plan loses the proxy feature present in Free, while full per-tab proxy assignment requires Pro. It is a poor fit for API-driven browser fleets.

What Is a Proxy Browser?

A proxy browser is a browser or browser-management application that can route a browsing profile through a selected proxy server. In the multi-profile products reviewed here, the normal connection model is:

The browser profile and proxy are related but separate:

The word antidetect is vendor terminology, not a protocol or independent certification. It usually means the product controls or standardizes some browser-visible signals—such as the user agent, platform, screen, language, timezone, Canvas, WebGL, or WebRTC behavior—while keeping profile data separate. The exact controls and their implementation differ by product and version.

For a technical explanation of the signals websites can observe, read what browser fingerprinting is and how it works.

Proxy Browser vs. Antidetect Browser vs. Proxy Extension

Search results often mix four different tools:

For a practical example of extension-based profiles, PAC files, and URL rules, read the SwitchyOmega and ZeroOmega setup guide.

If you only need a toolbar button to change Chrome's connection, use the Chrome proxy extension comparison. If you are choosing between guest operating-system separation and profile management, read virtual machines vs. antidetect browsers. For remotely hosted automation, compare cloud browsers for AI agents.

How We Ranked the Best Proxy Browsers

We evaluated each product using information a buyer can verify:

1. Profile model: persistent or disposable profiles, local or cloud storage, and the state retained between launches.
2. External proxy support: documented protocols, authentication, testing, bulk import, and per-profile assignment.
3. Automation: official APIs, CDP, SDKs, RPA, and documented support for Selenium, Puppeteer, or Playwright.
4. Team operations: seats, roles, permissions, profile sharing, locks, logs, and transfer controls.
5. Pricing unit: profiles, users, concurrency, launches, browser minutes, or usage-based charges.
6. Entry path: permanent free plan, temporary trial, or lowest paid plan.
7. Operational fit: whether the product is primarily designed for manual profile work, visual automation, developer automation, mobile workflows, or simpler multi-session browsing.
8. Documentation quality: whether current first-party sources explain limits and behavior clearly enough to evaluate.

We did not assign synthetic scores for “anonymity,” “stealth,” or account survival. Those outcomes depend on the destination, account history, browser behavior, network route, settings, and software version. Vendor claims that a product passes a fingerprint checker do not establish universal acceptance on unrelated websites.

Built-In Proxies vs. External Proxy Providers

A browser subscription and proxy service solve separate problems even when one company sells both.

GoLogin, Multilogin, Incogniton, and Nstbrowser currently bundle or sell some proxy access. AdsPower facilitates third-party proxy purchases but states that it is primarily the management platform. Octo has a Proxy Shop, while also supporting external providers. Kameleo expects the operator to supply a compatible route. Regardless of the purchase path, check the IP source, protocol, location accuracy, session behavior, traffic terms, credential controls, and acceptable-use policy.

Using a Proxy Browser With Proxidize

A compatible browser profile needs four connection values from the proxy provider:

The placeholders are not functioning credentials. Generate the real access point in the provider dashboard and never publish its password in an article, screenshot, repository, or support ticket.

For Proxidize, use Residential Proxies when the workflow needs global country, city, or ISP targeting across 195+ countries. Use Mobile Proxies when the observation specifically needs a real US mobile-carrier route. Both products support standard browser-compatible protocols and rotating or sticky session options, but availability and plan terms differ.

Practical Setup

1. Create a new browser profile for the account, client, region, or QA scenario.
2. Choose custom or external proxy in that profile's network settings.
3. Select the exact protocol shown by the Proxidize access point and enter its host, port, username, and password.
4. Use a sticky session when one workflow needs continuity across login, navigation, forms, or several related pages. Start a different session for an independent observation when rotation is required.
5. Let the browser derive timezone, language, and geolocation from the proxy where the product supports that behavior, or set them deliberately for the test. Do not randomize values without a reason.
6. Open an IP-checking page inside the configured profile. Confirm the observed public IP and location, then use the Proxidize browser fingerprint and WebRTC tools to inspect whether network and browser signals match the intended test.
7. Test an incorrect proxy password once in a safe environment. The profile should fail visibly rather than silently using the direct connection.
8. Record the profile, proxy access-point identifier, intended location, observed location, timestamp, and result—but never the password.

One browser profile does not automatically require one permanently unique IP. Several pages in one checkout or QA journey may need continuity; unrelated regional observations may need independent sessions. A residential or mobile peer can also disconnect, so “sticky” means the provider attempts to retain the selected exit, not that the exit can never disappear.

How to Evaluate a Proxy Browser Safely

The product will handle browser sessions and may hold sensitive cookies, profile data, extensions, proxy credentials, and team access. Treat it as operational software, not merely a privacy add-on.

Before purchasing, ask:

• Where are profiles stored—locally, in the vendor's cloud, or both?
• Which data is encrypted, and who controls the keys?
• Can an administrator restrict profile visibility and export?
• Does the product offer two-factor authentication, session history, audit logs, and revocation?
• How long are logs, deleted profiles, and backups retained?
• Which subprocessors and proxy-network partners handle data?
• How quickly are browser engines updated after Chromium or Firefox releases?
• Can profiles be exported if the subscription ends?
• What happens when a proxy fails: visible error, direct fallback, or retry?
• Are automation and API limits documented for the plan being purchased?

Run a small trial with non-sensitive test accounts and synthetic data. Verify cookie separation, proxy failure behavior, team permissions, deletion, export, browser updates, resource consumption, and support response before moving production access into the product.

Responsible and Lawful Use

Profile isolation has legitimate uses: regional website QA, ad and landing-page verification, client-authorized account administration, reproducible browser testing, accessibility checks, market research, and permitted automation or public-data collection.

It does not create permission to:

• create fake accounts or identities;
• operate accounts that you do not own or have authority to manage;
• evade a suspension, access control, paywall, or platform enforcement decision;
• send spam, create fake engagement or reviews, or commit advertising fraud;
• collect non-public or sensitive personal data without authorization;
• perform credential attacks, phishing, malware delivery, or unauthorized security testing;
• misrepresent a device, location, or person where doing so is unlawful, deceptive, or prohibited by the relevant agreement.

Before deploying, review applicable laws, data-protection duties, employment and client agreements, platform terms, and the proxy provider's policies. Proxidize services are limited to lawful, legitimate business purposes under the Acceptable Use Policy, require identity verification, and do not guarantee anonymity or access to any destination.

Common Proxy Browser Mistakes

Treating the Browser as the Proxy

Creating another profile does not necessarily change the public IP. Assign and verify the network route separately.

Treating the Proxy as the Browser Profile

Changing an IP does not clear cookies, create a new profile, or align the reported OS, language, timezone, screen, and browser version.

Using Rotation During a Stateful Workflow

A new exit in the middle of an authenticated or multi-step journey can create inconsistent location and session signals. Use a suitable sticky session for related actions, then rotate between independent observations if the workflow calls for it.

Assuming Every “Mobile Profile” Is a Mobile Device

A desktop browser configured to report mobile characteristics is not automatically a native Android or iOS environment. Cloud phones, emulated mobile browsers, and physical devices have different capabilities, sensors, app support, automation interfaces, and costs.

Comparing Only the Number of Stored Profiles

Stored profiles, simultaneous browser sessions, daily launches, API requests, team seats, cloud minutes, and proxy traffic are different limits. Model all of them for the intended workload.

Trusting a Fingerprint Checker as a Universal Result

A checker shows what that checker observed at that moment. Passing it does not prove that another website will accept the profile or that the configuration is anonymous.

Putting Production Credentials Into Screenshots or Scripts

Proxy passwords, cookies, one-time passwords, and browser profile exports can grant access. Use secret storage, least-privilege team roles, revocation, and redaction.

Final Verdict: What Is the Best Proxy Browser in 2026?

GoLogin is the best general-purpose starting point for a solo operator in this documented comparison. Multilogin is the stronger integrated browser-and-cloud-phone option, AdsPower is better suited to visual automation, Octo Browser provides a more structured paid workspace, and Kameleo is the developer-focused choice.

Shortlist two or three products and run the same representative workflow through each. Compare setup time, profile consistency, browser resources, proxy failure behavior, team controls, automation reliability, and total cost. Do not buy on an “undetectable” promise—no responsible comparison can make one.